![]() A certain amount of ambition in these directions is healthy for instance, if a promising new technique in the field has just been developed by you or your colleagues, it does make sense to revisit problems or concepts that were previously considered to be too difficult to touch, and see if there is now some potential for dramatic progress. If one does not acknowledge and adapt to these developments, for instance by learning the new tools, there is the long-term danger that one’s bag of tricks may slowly become obsolete, or that one’s results may lose relevance and be increasingly perceived as “boring”.Īt the other extreme, there is the temptation to forego the tedious process of incremental improvements and refinements to existing research, and instead jump straight to the really famous or difficult unsolved problems, or to develop some radical new theory, hoping for the mathematical equivalent of “winning the lottery”. But while there is certainly merit in practicing the skills that one have already acquired, and there is undeniably short-term value to one’s career in writing publishable papers, there is a long-term opportunity cost to pursuing such a conservative approach exclusively mathematical understanding and technology continually progresses, and eventually new ideas from other fields or other approaches will play increasingly important roles in one’s own field of expertise, especially if the field you work in is of particular interest to others. ![]() It is often tempting for a research mathematician to get into the comfortable habit of only tackling problems which are well within range this assures a steady stream of unexceptional but decent publications, and spares one the effort of having to learn new fields, new points of view, new developments, or new techniques. In contrast, with problems which are well out of range, it will be much less obvious how to compare the feasibility of various competing approaches, or even how to come up with an approach at all. Problems within this range may not necessarily be trivial, easy, or routine for this mathematician, but it will be clear to him or her how one should get started on the problem, what the main difficulties are, where in the literature one should look for guidance, which methods are reasonably likely to work and which ones are not, and so forth. In mathematics, the opponents are unsolved or imperfectly understood mathematical problems, concepts, and theories, rather than other mathematicians but the principle is broadly the same.Įvery mathematician, at any given point in time, has a “range” a region of mathematics which one can effectively handle using one’s existing knowledge, intuition, experience, and “bag of tricks”. ( Kurt Lewin)Īmong chess players, it is generally accepted that one of the most effective ways to improve one’s skill is to continually play against opponents which are slightly higher rated than you are. In this way he steadily raises his level of aspiration. A successful individual typically sets his next goal somewhat but not too much above his last achievement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |